Abstract
HIV
epidemic continues to involve researchers and clinicians to
unearth new facts about the virus and develop new treatment
regimens for patients. The status of anti-HIV treatments is
never static but constantly changing due to complicated
genetic diversity of the virus and the inability of the body
to clear the virus. The development of combination therapy is
viewed as an essential step to increase the life span of the
HIV positive individuals. Tremendous strides have occurred in
the HIV/AIDS arena, yet daunting challenges remain. This
article presents a glimpse of recent advances in combination
therapy for AIDS.
Introduction
Since
the AIDS epidemic began, the FDA has approved 47 drugs for the
treatment of HIV/AIDS, including 19 antiretroviral drugs for
use singly or in combination therapy.[1]
Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART) regimens
utilizing protease
inhibitors (PIs) are a major factor in reducing the number of
AIDS deaths from the mid-1990s to the present. It has been
identified a pipeline of 52 drugs for HIV infection and AIDS,
including extended release formulations of existing
antiretroviral therapies, immune modulators, fusion
inhibitors, vaccines, topical microbicides and drugs targeting
dementia [2],
lipodystrophy [3]
and other complications of AIDS.
HAART
regimens
The
most common initial regimens consist of two nucleoside
analogs, combined with either a PI, an NNRTI (Non Nucleoside
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors) or a third nucleoside
analog. The combination of two nukes and a PI is supported by
data from randomized studies with clinical endpoints.[4]
These regimens, however, often involve a considerable pill
burden and relatively frequent side effects, which makes
compliance difficulties. They are possibly quite robust with
regard to immunological efficacy [5]
which has yet to be demonstrated for NNRTIs or nukes. NNRTs
with two nucleoside analogs regimen is found to have
advantages as they are effective with low pill burden and good
tolerability. However, the significantly emerging disadvantage
is rapid development of cross resistance. Most explored
nucleoside analogs combination is Trizivir [ AZT ( Azidothymidine),
3TC ( Epivir) and abacavir] but studies have shown that in
patients with a high viral load, efficacy was inferior to PI
combinations.[6]
More
recently Bristol-Myers Squibb [7]
has submitted an NDA (New Drug Application) for Zerit, [8]
an extended-release preparation of stavudine, which is a NRTI
(Nucleoside Reverse Rranscriptase Inhibitor). The one-capsule,
once daily formulation should improve quality of life and
compliance relative to the FDA-approved immediate-release
formulation of Zerit, with similar virologic activity. In a
recent phase III multinational, randomized, doubleblind,
placebo controlled trial, BMS 099
(a type of studies performed by Bristol-Myers Squibb)
combining Zerit with efavirenz and lamivudine, 80% of the 392
patients in the treatment arm containing Zerit extended
release achieved viral load suppression below 400 copies/mL
after 48 weeks of treatment, compared with 75% of the 391
patients in the arm containing Zerit immediate release. More
than half of the patients in each treatment arm reduced viral
load to fewer than 50 copies/mL, and adverse events were
similar in both groups.[9]
Coviracil
(emtricitabine) is another NRTI for which Triangle
Pharmaceuticals [10],[11]
has submitted an NDA. This drug has potent selective activity
against both (HBV) hepatitis B virus
and HIV. In a 48-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled
phase III trial [FTC-301, The
FTC 301 study is a randomised, double-blind, double dummy
comparative study of FTC (Emtricitabine) vs d4T with a
backbone of didanosine and efavirenz in 571 treatment naive
individuals]
comparing once-a-day Coviracil to immediate-release Zerit
given twice daily, each combined with efavirenz and Videx EC (didanosine),
interim analysis of safety and efficacy led to unblinding the
trial and offering Coviracil to all 571 subjects. Patients
with Coviracil in the arm had significant improvements in
immunologic function, and 87% had persistent virologic
response through six months.[12],[13]
To
tackle the emerging problem of antiretroviral resistance,
Pfizer [14]
is in phase III testing of capravirine, [15]
a second-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase
inhibitor (NNRTI) which has been shown in several studies to
retain activity against HIV that has developed some NNRTI-resistant
mutations, including K103N.[16]
After the unexpected development of vasculitis in animal
models, the FDA placed human clinical trials of capravirine on
partial clinical hold in January, 2001.[17]
Agouron Pharmaceuticals, [18]
a Pfizer company slated to market capravirine, believes that
it may offer unique benefits to HIV infected patients and
therefore remains committed to its clinical development and to
additional toxicology studies.
One
of the problems with available protease inhibitors (PI) is
their tendency to increase blood lipid concentrations. In
hopes of circumventing this problem, Bristol-Myers Squibb has
begun phase III testing of atazanavir, an experimental PI
formerly called BMS-232632. [19]
A randomized trial in 467 patients at 51 sites suggests that
concentrations of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and
triglycerides do not increase significantly in treatment naive
patients taking a HAART regimen including atazanavir, and that
the drug is effective, safe and well tolerated compared to
nelfinavir. Other advantages include once daily dosing and
fewer gastrointestinal effects, but the drug is more likely to
induce jaundice than nelfinavir.[20]
Unlike
currently approved antiretroviral drugs, which target viral
enzymes involved in replication, the fusion inhibitors are
designed to block HIV from fusing with a host cell before the
virus begins replication within the cell. Trimeris [21]has
submitted an NDA for fusion inhibitor Fuzeon (enfuvirtide;
formerly T-20) [22]
and has received fast track designation from the FDA.
Physician enrollment for the U.S. Early Access Program for
Fuzeon began August 19, 2002, for a limited number of patients
with advanced HIV disease. Data from two large, international
phase III trials suggest that patients on combination therapy
with Fuzeon are twice as likely to achieve undetectable blood
levels of HIV and a significant increase in immune cells at 24
weeks compared with patients who received combination therapy
without Fuzeon.[23]
PRO
542,
known as CD4-IgG2, is a novel fusion
protein that incorporates the HIV-binding region of the human
cell surface receptor for HIV into a human antibody molecule,
[24]
from
Progenics Pharmaceuticals [25]
is a novel fusion protein shown to safely reduce viral load by
60% to 80% in selected patients. Multi-dose phase II studies
are under way of PRO 542 as salvage therapy for HIV-infected
patients refractory to currently available antiretroviral
medications.
Rather
than targeting the HIV virus directly, immune system
modulators boost the ability of the immune system to pause
viral spread. These include Celgene’s drug Thalomid
(thalidomide) [26];
Chiron’s product IL-2 Proleukin (aldesleukin), [27]
a recombinant form of interleukin-2; Alferon N Injection
(interferon a-n3), a human leukocyte derived natural
interferon treatment, and WF10 (an immuno modulator) designed
by Dimethaid Research [28]
to enhance macrophage function and to thereby eliminate
reservoirs of HIV-infected CD4 cells and macrophages. All
these drugs are in phase III development. WF10 [29],
intended for use as adjunctive treatment, is a chemically
stabilized chloride matrix called tetrachlorodecaoxygen (TDCO).
Studies to date suggest that WF10, administered intra-venously,
is safe in patients with HIV and that it may be especially
useful in moderate to advanced AIDS. [30]
By promoting phagocytosis and reducing macrophage production
of TNF-a (Tumor Necrosis Factor-a), WF10 may slow AIDS
progression and reduce the likelihood of opportunistic
infections.
Based
on phase II trials by Immune Response Corporation, Remune
(HIV-1 immunogen) [31]
is a promising adjunctive therapy using inactivated virus to
restore HIV specific immune responses, with positive effects
on viral load and on counts of CD4 helper T lymphocytes.
Vaccines
designed to prevent AIDS rather than to slow its progression
are AIDSVAX B/B and AIDSVAX B/E, both in phase III development
by VaxGen.[32],[33]
An
alternate approach to prevention is the spermicidal
microbicide BufferGel (polyacrylic acid), in phase III
development by ReProtect. [34]
By increasing the acidity of semen, this product tends to kill
sperm and to inactivate pathogens including HIV, HPV, herpes,
syphilis and gonorrhea. [35]
Data on the anti-HIV activity of BufferGel are expected in two
years.
Post
treatment issues
Complications
of AIDS include lipodystrophy syndrome associated with HAART,
for which Ark Therapeutics [36]
is in phase II testing of EG005, a drug that reduces cellular
levels of Angiotensin II and thereby increases mitochondrial
efficiency.
Drugs
targeting AIDS-related dementia for which phase II testing is
completed include CPI-1189 (4-acetylamino-N-tert-butyl-benzamide)
from Centaur Pharmaceuticals [37]
and memantine (3,5-dimethyl-adamantan-1-ylamine) from Forest
Laboratories.[38]
CPI-1189,
prevents apoptosis and reduces glial fibrillary acidic protein
immunostaining in a TNF-a infusion model for AIDS dementia
complex, [39]
is
an
oral drug that potentially inhibits neuroinflammation, has
safely produced statistically and clinically significant
cognitive improvements in AIDS dementia in double-blind,
placebo- controlled clinical studies lasting five months.
Memantine,
which modulates N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activity,
has been used to treat other types of dementia, with rapid and
lasting improvement in cognitive, psychological, social and
motor impairments. Animal models including transgenic mice
suggest the applicability of this drug to AIDS dementia, for
which clinical trials are ongoing.[40]
Conclusion
Drugs
identified in the pipeline may continue to improve the outlook
for AIDS patients however significant progress in HAART has
reduced the number of AIDS deaths in recent years. New
antiretroviral drugs and their combination regimens may
improve tolerability and compliance. Emergence of fusion
proteins, which prevent HIV entry into the cell may prove as
one of the major tools in the management of the disease.
Additionally immune modulators work synergistically in order
to reduce the viral load as well as immunogens are supposed to
improve immunity.
References
[4].
Hammer, S. M.; Squires, K. E.; Hughes, M. D.; et al. N.
Engl. J. Med., 1997,
337,
725-33.
[5].
Kaufmann, D.; Pantaleo, G.; Sudre, P.; Telenti, A. Lancet,
1998,
351,
723-724.
[6].
Vibhagool, A.; Cahn, P.; Schechter, M.; et. al. Ist
IAS conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment, Buenos
Aires, Argentina,
2001,
Abstract 63.
[8].
Bihari, B. U.S.
Pat. Appl. Publ., CODEN: USXXCO
US 2003105121
A1 20030605
CAN 139:986 AN
2003:435315, 2003,
10pp.
[15].
Brown, W. M. Curr.
Opin. Anti-Infective
Investi. Drugs, 2000,
2,
286-294.
[16].
Tashima, K. T.;
Flanigan, T. P.; Kurpewski, J.; Melanson, S. M.; Skolnik, P.
R. Clin.
Infec. Dis., 2002,
35,
82-83.
[19].
Haas, D. W.; Zala, C.; Schrader, S.; Piliero, P.;
Jaeger, H.; Nunes, D.; Thiry, A.; Schnittman, S.; Sension,
M. AIDS,
2003,
13,
1339-1349.
[20].
http://www.natap.org/2001/8thEccathi/day1.htm
[22].
Anonymous AIDS
ALERT, 2003,
18,
78-79.
[24].
Zhu, P.; Olson,
W. C.; Roux, K. H. J.
Viro., 2001,
75,
6682-6686.
[26].
Hashimoto, Y. Farumashia,
2003,
39,
315-319.
[27].
David, D.; Naiet-Ighil,
L.; Dupont, B.; Maral, J.; Gachot, B.; Theze, J. 6th
European Conference on Experimental AIDS Research, June
23-26, 2001,
91-96.
[29].
McGrath, M. S.; Kahn,
J. O.; Herndier, B. G. Curr.
Opin. Invest. Drugs, 2002,
3,
365-373.
[30].Ennen,
J.; Werner, K.; Kuhne, F. W.; Kurth, R.
AIDS, 1993, 7, 1205-1212.
[31].
Churdboonchart, V.;
Sakondhavat, C.; Kulpradist, S.; Isarangkura Na Ayudthya,
B.; Chandeying, V.; Rugpao, S.; Boonshuyar, C.;
Sukeepaisarncharoen, W.; Sirawaraporn, W.; Carlo, D. J.;
Moss, R.
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 2001,
8,
1295.
[33].
Johnston R. AIDS
PATIENT CARE AND STDS, 2003,
17,
47-51.
[35].
van De, W. J.; Fullem,
A.; Kelly, C.; Mehendale,
S.; Rugpao, S.; Kumwenda, N.; Chirenje, Z.; Joshi, S.
J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr., 2001,
26,
21-27.
[39].
Bjugstad, K. B.;
Flitter, W. D.; Garland, W. A.; Philpot, R. M.; Kirstein, C.
L.; Arendash, G. W.
J. Neu.Viro., 2000,
6,
478-491.
[40].
Wilcock, G. K.
Lancet Neurology, 2003,
2,
503-505.